Students will advise Truman on the integration of the US military after WWII. They will play the role of individuals who advise the President based on primary sources.
This lesson will help students understand that even though today, integration seems like an obvious decision, in Truman’s presidency it is not so. This lesson will help students understand the difficulty of the decision and also importance of the decision in its impact on the push for Civil Rights.
- Students will understand what integration of the military meant.
- Students will understand the importance and difficulty of such a decision.
- Students will interpret a primary source documents.
- Students will construct persuasive arguments for the stance they take.
- CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RH.9-10.6
Compare the point of view of two or more authors for how they treat the same or similar topics, including which details they include and emphasize in their respective accounts. - CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.9-10.1
Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. - CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.SL.1
Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others' ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively. - CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.9-10.1
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
- http://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/online-collections/harry-truman-and-civil-rights
- Southern Male
- Telegram in support of Civil Rights
- Southern Female
- Resolution
- NAACP
- Telegram for protection
- Note from Civil Rights Committee
- Integration Executive Order https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=84&page=transcript
- Divide the students into groups of 5, with one kid being assigned the role of President Truman (this kid should be a leader and strong at conducting the group)
- Divide the readings among the students. Truman should receive the resolution. Other’s should be divided evenly, but keep one perspective.
- Have the students read over the sources and create a short summary to give to the president in their groups.
- The President will conduct a cabinet meeting to be advised on what he should do. The other students don’t argue their point, so much as tell the president what is happening, how people feel, what the reaction might be and from their perspective, what should they do.
- Truman will be able to ask questions of the advisers.
- Then have all Truman’s come together to and decide as to what they should do and why they made the choice.
- The Truman’s can then report out, or you could do a mock press conference with Truman.
- Students will be graded with the following rubric
|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Historical Accuracy |
All historical information appeared to be accurate and in chronological order. |
Almost all historical information appeared to be accurate and in chronological order. |
Most of the historical information was accurate and in chronological order. |
Very little of the historical information was accurate and/or in chronological order. |
Knowledge Gained |
Can clearly explain several ways in which his character "saw" things differently than other characters and can clearly explain why. |
Can clearly explain several ways in which his character "saw" things differently than other characters. |
Can clearly explain one way in which his character "saw" things differently than other characters. |
Cannot explain one way in which his character "saw" things differently than other characters. |
Required Elements |
Student included more information than was required. |
Student included all information that was required. |
Student included most information that was required. |
Student included less information than was required. |
Role |
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were consistently in character. |
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were often in character. |
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were sometimes in character. |
Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were rarely in character. |