Individual assignments using primary sources – transcripts from HUAC investigations; The US Constitution
Students will understand their constitutional rights and responsibilities
- Identify rights guaranteed in 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments
- Describe situations that tested these rights
- Knowledge of Bill of Rihts
- Understanding of Cold War events, McCarthyism,
- Apply knowledge and understanding of historical events to current events
Missouri Standards
1. Principles expressed in the documents shaping constitutional democracy in the United States
2. Continuity and change in the history of Missouri, the United States and the world
Kansas Standards
Benchmark 2: The student understands the shared ideals and diversity of American society and political culture.
1. (K) recognizes that a nation’s values are embodied in the Constitution, statutes, and important court cases (e.g., Dred Scott vs. Sanford, Plessy vs. Ferguson, Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka).
2. (K) understands core civic values inherent in the United States Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence that have been the foundation for unity in American society (e.g., right to free speech, religion, press, assembly; equality; human dignity; civic responsibility, sovereignty of the people).
- Textbooks
- A+ computer program
- Video: The Majestic
- HUAC transcripts
- US Constitution
- Video from HUAC hearings
- Photocopy of loyalty oaths
Computer programs, Truman Library Website, DVD/TV
Students will read through the Bll of Rghts and put into their own words what those rights mean today. They will then prioritize those rights as they apply to students.
Students will view videos on the HUAC hearings, read transcripts taken, and write a 1 page reflection paper on those events.
Students will view the video The Majestic and write a brief summary of the video explaining how it relates to this topic.
I will give the students a 25 point test including matching, short answer, and 1 essay question which will demonstrate their knowledge of terminology, names of people involved, and their interpretation of the phrase “Does the end justify the means?” as it relates to Cold War issues.