Using the primary sources provided, students will work in groups to evaluate four options available to President Truman to end the war in Japan and to end the Second World War.
To have students engage in deliberative thinking and fully examine various options available to Truman. Rather than a black/white; yes/no on dropping the atomic bomb, students will examine four options in depth
- To consider more than just dropping the bomb or not
- work with a small group to discuss and evaluate four options
- engage in a whole-class discussion debriefing this activity and to write their own viewpoint in a position paper
KS Standards for History, Government, and Social Studies (adopted April 2013):
- Standard 1, Benchmark 2: The student will analyze the context under which choices are made and draw conclusions about the motivations and goals of the decision-makers.
- Standard 3, Benchmark 1: The student will recognize and evaluate significant beliefs, contributions, and ideas of the many diverse peoples and groups and their impact on individuals, communities, states, and nations.
Best Practices & Literacy Expectations:
- The use of primary sources - Interpret a variety of primary sources in traditional and digital formats provides the opportunity for students to recognize the discipline’s subjective nature, directly touch the lives of people in the past, and develop high level analytical skills.
- Higher order thinking - Grappling with content knowledge beyond remembering and understanding, to applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
- Literacy within the Social Studies - Reading, comprehending, analyzing, and interpreting complex texts and media from various social studies disciplines.
Read background material from credible sources
https://www.nps.gov/articles/trumanatomicbomb.htm
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB162/
http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2015/03/06/to-demonstrate-or-not-to-demonstrate/
http://www.weeklystandard.com/why-truman-dropped-the-bomb/article/7093
Deliberative thinking process - http://www.scottlondon.com/reports/dialogue.html
- Discuss the deliberative thinking model with students. http://www.scottlondon.com/reports/dialogue.html
- Have students examine the variety of secondary and primary sources related to Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb (see list above)
- Discuss the four options outlined in the NPS article
https://www.nps.gov/articles/trumanatomicbomb.htm
In groups have students consider together the four options available to Truman. Have them write down on the worksheet the advantages and drawbacks of each option – even if they don’t agree with it. Have them consider all advantages and disadvantages
Prompt more responses with questions such as “what would the rest of the world think about this option”? “what would the Japanese think of this option”? and “what would the American public think about this option”?
Ensure students give equal weight to each of the four options
Have each group report back on their completed worksheet.
Assignment:
Have students individually write a position paper as if they were president. Which of the four options would they have chosen and why? Students must use both secondary and primary sources to back up their argument
For the individual paper use this template scoring rubric http://uncw.edu/cas/documents/Elaboratedcompetencies3.pdf
Teacher can assign points to each category as they see fit
Other points can be assigned for participation in the group discussion.
President Truman had four options:
- Continue conventional bombing of Japanese cities
- Land invasion of Japan
- Demonstrate the bomb on an unpopulated island
- Drop the bomb on an inhabited Japanese city
Continue conventional bombing |
Land Invasion of Japan |
Demonstrate bomb on an unpopulated island |
Drop the bomb on an inhabited Japanese city |
||||
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed chart (teacher can add more answers, these are just a starting point)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue conventional bombing |
Land Invasion of Japan |
Demonstrate bomb on an unpopulated island |
Drop the bomb on an inhabited Japanese city |
||||
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Safe approach |
War would carry on |
Eventual surrender by mid-1946 if all went well |
War would carry on |
Might cause Japan to surrender |
Japanese move US POWS into area |
Save US lives |
Huge loss of Japanese lives |
Possibility of a negotiated peace |
More casualties (80,000 killed in Tokyo attack in one day) |
Not as many casualties as Atomic Bomb |
More casualties on both sides |
Radiation (largely not understood at time) |
Might not work – dependent on parachute and timer |
End war quickly |
Radiation (largely not understood at time) |
More humane approach |
Worry of stalemate |
Radiation (largely not understood at time) |
Worry of stalemate |
|
At the time only two A-bombs existed |
Japanese surrender likely |
US lose moral high ground |
|
American public opinion turning against war |
|
American public opinion turning against war |
|
Still unlikely to surrender |
Revenge for Pearl Harbor |
Seen as aggressor |
|
No chance of surrender |
|
Build-up of Japanese defenses was larger than thought |
|
Threat to bomber crews |
|
|
|
|
|
Secret intelligence revealed large Japanese defenses |
|
Who would witness and how reliable would their testimony be? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|